Interesting…. do you have more pictures of how you used it?

 

Interesting…. do you have more pictures of how you used it?

- EarlS

No, but here is a link to the video of the guy that invented it using the system.

 

looks pretty well designed and useful.

 

Looks well made, but also an awful lot of "to do" for making a table top for cutting straight lines with a track saw, which can be accomplished on pretty much any surface with a track system. One can also make a jig to perform the same task of making the dig holes, if you feel them to be necessary, out of scraps and two rulers or just one ruler and a t-square. How much does that thing cost? I'm just trying to understand why such a system is useful beyond a good straight edge and ruler.

 

Bob - thanks for posting the link. Definitely a simple system using some basic geometry that appears to produce an extremely accurate grid.

 

Looks well made, but also an awful lot of "to do" for making a table top for cutting straight lines with a track saw, which can be accomplished on pretty much any surface with a track system. One can also make a jig to perform the same task of making the dig holes, if you feel them to be necessary, out of scraps and two rulers or just one ruler and a t-square. How much does that thing cost? I m just trying to understand why such a system is useful beyond a good straight edge and ruler.

- builtinbkyn

My only advice is to watch the videos from the developer. It has more capabilities than just square cuts.

 

Bill - it all depends on the amount of accuracy you want in your table layout. As you note, you can certainly make a table for your track system with a ruler and t-square. The Parf system lays out the dog hole starting with the factory edge of the MDF or plywood - whatever you prefer. It builds a very accurate grid that, by its design, is not subject to the errors introduced by laying out with pencil marks and measuring instruments that ride on the surface. For those who want the best and prefer to build their 20mm systems (sorry, it's metric only), the Parf guide is the instrument of choice and, incidentally, its layout supports the 93mm system specifications for European cabinet hinges.

Woodpeckers recently introduced a system that will create either 20mm or 3/4" dog holes, theirs is based upon a clamped-on plate to guide the drill position. I'd like to see a head-to-head comparison of the two systems. I have a sneaking suspicion that the Parf system would come out on top.

Karl

 

Woodpeckers recently introduced a system that will create either 20mm or 3/4" dog holes, theirs is based upon a clamped-on plate to guide the drill position. I d like to see a head-to-head comparison of the two systems. I have a sneaking suspicion that the Parf system would come out on top.

Karl

- kkaucher

I was tempted to get the Woodpecker jig but it's just too much money after shipping to Canada. Instead, I'm having a friend with a CNC cut me a similar jig out of a cutting board. That being said, I prefer the Woodpecker jig to the Parf and actually feel the opposite to you. I think the Woodpecker jig would come out on top and sourcing good 1/2" bits seems like it's far easier than the expensive 20mm Forstner bits.

 

Woodpeckers recently introduced a system that will create either 20mm or 3/4" dog holes, theirs is based upon a clamped-on plate to guide the drill position. I d like to see a head-to-head comparison of the two systems. I have a sneaking suspicion that the Parf system would come out on top.

Karl

- kkaucher

I was tempted to get the Woodpecker jig but it s just too much money after shipping to Canada. Instead, I m having a friend with a CNC cut me a similar jig out of a cutting board. That being said, I prefer the Woodpecker jig to the Parf and actually feel the opposite to you. I think the Woodpecker jig would come out on top and sourcing good 1/2" bits seems like it s far easier than the expensive 20mm Forstner bits.

- charlton

The nice thing about this system is you don't have to source the Forstner bit because it comes with it. A good solid carbide spiral uncut bit is just as expensive and you don't get the depth of cut. Someone mentioned earlier that this system references a factory edge and that it's on a 93 mm grid. Those are both inaccurate. You are not limited to referencing from any edge. You can start the pattern anywhere you want and square the sheet off after. Also it's on a 96 mm grid which is 3 units of 32 mm that most European cabinets are set up with. I looked at both, the Woodpecker OTT and the Parf guide System when purchasing and I found the latter to be more suitable for my needs. My intention for posting this review was not to persuade anyone into buying it. It was meant to let people know what I felt about it if anyone else was considering buying one. As another poster had asked if you couldn't just do the same thing with a T square and a straight edge. Yes and no. You can produce a grid of holes for sure, but they won't be nearly as accurate as this system. But hey, if someone is happy with that arrangement then go for it. If a person can't immediately see the benefit in something like this then they most likely don't need one. I like the ability to put in a couple of bench dogs and know that my cuts will be perfectly square or at various angles. Because by placing the dogs in different holes you can get accurate angles too based on rise/run. The cost of a replacement MFT top alone will almost pay for this system. Another application would be making something like the Stanton Workbench (Search it on YouTube)

 

The nice thing about this system is you don't have to source the Forstner bit because it comes with it. A good solid carbide spiral uncut bit is just as expensive and you don't get the depth of cut. Someone mentioned earlier that this system references a factory edge and that it's on a 93 mm grid. Those are both inaccurate. You are not limited to referencing from any edge. You can start the pattern anywhere you want and square the sheet off after. Also it's on a 96 mm grid which is 3 units of 32 mm that most European cabinets are set up with. I looked at both, the Woodpecker OTT and the Parf guide System when purchasing and I found the latter to be more suitable for my needs. My intention for posting this review was not to persuade anyone into buying it. It was meant to let people know what I felt about it if anyone else was considering buying one. As another poster had asked if you couldn't just do the same thing with a T square and a straight edge. Yes and no. You can produce a grid of holes for sure, but they won't be nearly as accurate as this system. But hey, if someone is happy with that arrangement then go for it. If a person can't immediately see the benefit in something like this then they most likely don't need one. I like the ability to put in a couple of bench dogs and know that my cuts will be perfectly square or at various angles. Because by placing the dogs in different holes you can get accurate angles too based on rise/run. The cost of a replacement MFT top alone will almost pay for this system. Another application would be making something like the Stanton Workbench (Search it on YouTube)

- Bobmedic

I'm just thinking more down the road if and when the 20mm bit gets dull. Based on my metalworking experience, good half-inch router bits are far more easier to source economically than 20mm bits but then I live in Canada. Anyway, I considered the Parf, was set on buying it, saw the Woodpecker offer and then was set on getting it instead. In the end I didn't get anything. For my immediate need, I'll have my friend CNC a top for me but I don't want to rely on his goodwill forever.

Thanks for the post!

 

Bill - it all depends on the amount of accuracy you want in your table layout. As you note, you can certainly make a table for your track system with a ruler and t-square. The Parf system lays out the dog hole starting with the factory edge of the MDF or plywood - whatever you prefer. It builds a very accurate grid that, by its design, is not subject to the errors introduced by laying out with pencil marks and measuring instruments that ride on the surface. For those who want the best and prefer to build their 20mm systems (sorry, it s metric only), the Parf guide is the instrument of choice and, incidentally, its layout supports the 93mm system specifications for European cabinet hinges.

Woodpeckers recently introduced a system that will create either 20mm or 3/4" dog holes, theirs is based upon a clamped-on plate to guide the drill position. I d like to see a head-to-head comparison of the two systems. I have a sneaking suspicion that the Parf system would come out on top.

Karl

- kkaucher

Karl I don't question it's accuracy or the quality of the materials. However much of the work performed in a shop requires the same accuracy and can be achieved with the tools we already posses. The Parf system is basically a story stick or jig for drilling holes. I don't see why one cannot fabricate the same from some strips of hardwood or even from a pair of inexpensive aluminum rulers which are already marked for scale. Required tools for doing so would be a drill press with a fence and a ruler, if using wood strips. The inexpensive aluminum rules are pre-marked and would only require drilling. The same would go for the jig needed to bore the dog holes. Not much to it other than accurately laying out and drilling the initial holes on a piece of aluminum bar or some stable hardwood.

$200 for what amounts to a template that can easily be made in the shop seems rather high and there's nothing proprietary about it. I would think anyone with reasonable skills in measuring and layout could achieve the same accuracy by making their own. Now if an off the shelf product saves time from having to do the above, well time is money and I can understand the market for it for some.

 

I appreciate the review. I am getting ready to embark on a cabinet making extravaganza and found this system when researching ways to square door frames and drawer bodies. What are your thoughts for utilizing the system to basically make a square clamping table for those purposes? Thanks in advance for your time, Matt

 

I appreciate the review. I am getting ready to embark on a cabinet making extravaganza and found this system when researching ways to square door frames and drawer bodies. What are your thoughts for utilizing the system to basically make a square clamping table for those purposes? Thanks in advance for your time, Matt

- Matt887

Matt, I strongly encourage you to look at Dave Stanton's youTube series on making his Stanton Workbench for around $150. Look for the videos that are 3-4 months old - they all use the Parf guide system. If you're interested, Dave sells plans for $10 on Etsy: https://www.etsy.com/au/listing/558160019/plans-for-the-stanton-bench-metric?ref=shop_home_active_1

I'm really impressed with Dave's workbench. You can set it up on your kitchen table if you have to. It's a good system, and can be built for either imperial or metric holes and spacing. Enjoy!

 

Matt, if you're using the setup only for clamping and not as a sacrificial cutting top there are cheaper ways to go. MFT/3 tops go for $140 (roughly 21 1/2" by 36 3/4" clamping size) and Lee Valley sells ply grid 3/4" holed worksufaces. Or you could simply have a panel CNC cut locally. If you're planning on cutting using this system, I would consider the parf guide. (Just as a reference my MFT/3 is by far my most used Festool). My feeling is square doors and drawers come from square cuts and square assembly methods, not so much from square clamping.

 

Bill - it all depends on the amount of accuracy you want in your table layout. As you note, you can certainly make a table for your track system with a ruler and t-square. The Parf system lays out the dog hole starting with the factory edge of the MDF or plywood - whatever you prefer. It builds a very accurate grid that, by its design, is not subject to the errors introduced by laying out with pencil marks and measuring instruments that ride on the surface. For those who want the best and prefer to build their 20mm systems (sorry, it s metric only), the Parf guide is the instrument of choice and, incidentally, its layout supports the 93mm system specifications for European cabinet hinges.

Woodpeckers recently introduced a system that will create either 20mm or 3/4" dog holes, theirs is based upon a clamped-on plate to guide the drill position. I d like to see a head-to-head comparison of the two systems. I have a sneaking suspicion that the Parf system would come out on top.

Karl

- kkaucher

boys and Girls, I've come in a tad late but for those that still watch this blog and any newbies that may stumble across this.

I noted with interest mention of Dave Stanton. I made one of his style workbenches using the Parf Guide System (he has many useful follow up videos on the system)... I have made a number of these tabletops for friends, enough that with generous donations I have recovered the cost.

I had a swag of 19mm brass bench dogs and some shekels to spare, so I purchased the Woodpecker alternative. In comparison, if i give the Parf system 6 out of five, I give the Woodpecker 2- out of five (thats a two minus).
The integrity of the hole depends on the integrity of a following router template and if that is a tad mishaped, you are destined for disaster. Somehow I made a very loose fitting 20mm hole… how I did it I cannot explain, however, out of about 60 holes, 5 or 6 were oversized… as the template is references off existing holes all subsequent holes could be a tad out of whack. Now the Parf uses a similar reference of previous holes concept, the TCT bit will give a perfect consistent 20mm holes and the 3mm pin placemen (the Mk.II improves on the pin manipulation which I found a bit cumbersome in Mk.I) will ensure you have to really try hard to stuff it up.

I was so disappointed with the Woodpecker and impressed with the Parf, that when the Parf Mk.II was released, I snapped it up… It is a tad more user friendly while the basics still remain… yeah, as the missus says, I have more shekels to spare than brains. At penning this reply, I haven't used the Mk.II yet, however, I have used the old Parf Mk.I guide jig to hold a 19mm TCT bit to drill holes to be able to use my previously obsolete 19mm brass dogs… initially I didn't want to compromise the jig using a "foreign" (19mm) drill bit.

A friend belongs to a man's shed group and from the interest shown and offers made I can see me recovering the cost of the Mk.II… not that I have any intention of making any profit but if the cost is recovered, it's a win-win for all parties… though I might have to buy a new TCT drill bit with all the anticipated use.

 

I'm late to this topic because i just stumbled onto the Parf Guide while trying to find a way to make those perfect table tops with all the dog holes in them. In the last week i have watched nearly every video available and read everything i could find on this incredible tool. If Lee Valley had it in stock i would have ordered it by now. I think this is a real game changer for track saw users to get the very most out of their systems. Peter Parfitt certainly shows how you can take it beyond just making square cuts on those tops when built accurately with his system. With this system, a track saw and a pocket hole jig the beginner as well as the experienced can make cabinets dust free, safe, accurate and efficiently. Lee Valley says they will possibly have them on Mar 30th. Even at $300 CDN you need to take into account that it come with the bit and two low profile bench dogs. It isn't a regular forstner bit either as it has a guide point that follows the 3mm predrilled hole down through the top to keep it lined up at right angles to the top.

 

I m late to this topic …
- hoeeee

Cooee (Aussie greeting) Hoeeee... No idea whether you've seen Dave Stanton's build (and follow ups), but it's highly recommended.

Also if you buy, make sure it's the Mk.II... costs a few more shekels but is marginally better than Mk.I. I have tried to fumble through the difference.