If I'm not mistaken there are several threads regarding moisture meters on LJ.
After all this which type/which brand/model of MM does one rely on?OK, update !
I pulled a piece of 8/4 sapele left from last year s project that has been in the 40-45% RH environment.
It measures the same as the new pieces. I also measured some other species; cherry, walnut that are 10 years old and got similar readings. A 100 year old piece of white oak showed 9%, and a 180 year old piece of yellow pine showed 12%.
conclusion - both meters need to go in the trash.
- Carey Mitchell
Maybe I'm misunderstanding something.OK - the final word(s).
I cut a 2×2" piece form the end of one of the boards, weighed it to the nearest 0.001g, and placed it under a heat lamp for 3 days, the surface temp reaching about 170 degrees.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. sapele gives up moisture slowly, compared to other woods.
2. pre-heating measurements were 6%* and 12% (corrected for species) with the pin and capacitance meters, respectively. Weighed 4x per day.
3. At constant weight, indicating that all moisture that could be driven out was gone, the MC calculated to 7.8%.
4. The pin meter showed 6%. The Wagner pinless meter showed 7% remaiining.
5. so, the Wagner meter is unreliable. The pin meter is not far off.
6. I know some of the top people at Wagner from my former business experience and will be reaching out to them for an explanation.
- - I misread the pin meter by looking down at it; looking from the front side, it actully read 6%.
- Carey Mitchell
Oops, I could have phrased it better. The pin meter did read 6%, but that is the lowest it reads. Good enough for me.OK - the final word(s).
I cut a 2×2" piece form the end of one of the boards, weighed it to the nearest 0.001g, and placed it under a heat lamp for 3 days, the surface temp reaching about 170 degrees.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. sapele gives up moisture slowly, compared to other woods.
2. pre-heating measurements were 6%* and 12% (corrected for species) with the pin and capacitance meters, respectively. Weighed 4x per day.
3. At constant weight, indicating that all moisture that could be driven out was gone, the MC calculated to 7.8%.
4. The pin meter showed 6%. The Wagner pinless meter showed 7% remaiining.
5. so, the Wagner meter is unreliable. The pin meter is not far off.
6. I know some of the top people at Wagner from my former business experience and will be reaching out to them for an explanation.
- - I misread the pin meter by looking down at it; looking from the front side, it actully read 6%.
- Carey Mitchell
Maybe I m misunderstanding something.
The pin meter read 6% both before and after heating? Even though the board lost weight between those measurements? (Assuming the weight loss was because of moisture loss)
And you re saying the pin meter is the accurate one?
- Tony1212