LumberJocks Woodworking Forum banner
  • Please post in our Community Feedback thread for help with the new forum software! If you are having trouble logging in, please Contact Us for assistance.
21 - 35 of 35 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,733 Posts
Springtime- Redbud

The following is my third post at Discovering Wood:

I've been debating which tree to start with, and then the answer came to me quite suddenly. Less than two weeks ago, the world where I live was still stuck in the greys of winter, but then it suddenly began to explode with the colors of spring. In my area, the eruption of color begins with the Bradford Pear (definitely a tree worth addressing later) followed by forsythia, daffodils, crabapple and dogwood.

Flower Plant Sky Tree Branch


They are all welcome harbingers of spring, but absolutely nothing compares with the shocking vibrancy of the Redbud tree (Cercis canadensis). Perhaps it is simply that it is the state tree of my home state of Oklahoma that warms the cockles of my heart. It abounds in so much of the surrounding manmade landscape because of its beautiful spring showing, but it offers multi-seasonal interest as well: 1) The leaves are nearly perfectly heart shaped.

Plant Terrestrial plant Flowering plant Tree Annual plant


Plant Terrestrial plant Groundcover Petal Grass


2) The bark is fairly smooth with a slight fishnet appearance on the young tree and branches, developing into small flat scales as the tree matures and its diameter increases. If the scales are disturbed or removed, the underbark is a distinctive reddish-brown.
Brown Trunk Terrestrial plant Wood Plant


Plant Wood Terrestrial plant Trunk Tree


Road surface Grey Trunk Wood Pattern


3) The Redbud also bears a seedpod through much of the winter, which resembles a flattened pea-pod and is often borne in clusters.
Plant Branch Twig Fruit Terrestrial plant


Raised in "captivity," these cultivated Redbuds are often asked to survive out in the open, far away from their preferred place in the understory, protected by the strong Oak or stately Ash. Subject to the strong Oklahoma winds, these contorted single or multi-stemmed trees take on an almost bonsai quality.

The redbud also abounds in the native landscape and pierces the darkness of the otherwise leafless forest, beckoning hikers to wander the understory.
Plant Flower Plant community Tree Branch


They are so prevalent in nature that it is said that they were once used as a delineator of USDA hardiness zones. They say that you can tell which zone that you are in based on when your redbuds begin blooming. I personally associate the arrival of its blossoms with the arrival of Easter. While the Dogwood is reportedly most intimately associated with the actual crucifixion, one of the nicknames of the Redbud is the "Judas Tree" as some people believe that Judas Iscariot hanged himself after his betrayal from a related tree Cercis siliquastrum.

Most of us would never consider Redbud as a viable source of wood. I've lived around them my entire life and have never found a piece in the firewood pile. You certainly won't find it in a commercial lumberyard. Large diameter Rebuds are not very common, although the National Register of Big Trees a tree in Jackson, MO that stands 39 feet tall with a circumference of 132 inches (a little math tells me that that is 42 inches in diameter). Wow! That may call for a road trip!

I intend to discuss each subject species over several posts, primarily to allow discoveries of information along the way. This includes information tendered by my readers. If you have personal experience, please feel free to add to this or any discussion in the comments section.

Next time, we will get into a discussion about the wood from the beautiful Redbud.
I look forward to hearing about your meal!
I planted a redbud a couple of years ago but have yet to see it in bloom. Last year it really grew a lot so maybe next month I'll see some "lunch blossoming" on my little tree.
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,169 Posts
Springtime- Redbud

The following is my third post at Discovering Wood:

I've been debating which tree to start with, and then the answer came to me quite suddenly. Less than two weeks ago, the world where I live was still stuck in the greys of winter, but then it suddenly began to explode with the colors of spring. In my area, the eruption of color begins with the Bradford Pear (definitely a tree worth addressing later) followed by forsythia, daffodils, crabapple and dogwood.

Flower Plant Sky Tree Branch


They are all welcome harbingers of spring, but absolutely nothing compares with the shocking vibrancy of the Redbud tree (Cercis canadensis). Perhaps it is simply that it is the state tree of my home state of Oklahoma that warms the cockles of my heart. It abounds in so much of the surrounding manmade landscape because of its beautiful spring showing, but it offers multi-seasonal interest as well: 1) The leaves are nearly perfectly heart shaped.

Plant Terrestrial plant Flowering plant Tree Annual plant


Plant Terrestrial plant Groundcover Petal Grass


2) The bark is fairly smooth with a slight fishnet appearance on the young tree and branches, developing into small flat scales as the tree matures and its diameter increases. If the scales are disturbed or removed, the underbark is a distinctive reddish-brown.
Brown Trunk Terrestrial plant Wood Plant


Plant Wood Terrestrial plant Trunk Tree


Road surface Grey Trunk Wood Pattern


3) The Redbud also bears a seedpod through much of the winter, which resembles a flattened pea-pod and is often borne in clusters.
Plant Branch Twig Fruit Terrestrial plant


Raised in "captivity," these cultivated Redbuds are often asked to survive out in the open, far away from their preferred place in the understory, protected by the strong Oak or stately Ash. Subject to the strong Oklahoma winds, these contorted single or multi-stemmed trees take on an almost bonsai quality.

The redbud also abounds in the native landscape and pierces the darkness of the otherwise leafless forest, beckoning hikers to wander the understory.
Plant Flower Plant community Tree Branch


They are so prevalent in nature that it is said that they were once used as a delineator of USDA hardiness zones. They say that you can tell which zone that you are in based on when your redbuds begin blooming. I personally associate the arrival of its blossoms with the arrival of Easter. While the Dogwood is reportedly most intimately associated with the actual crucifixion, one of the nicknames of the Redbud is the "Judas Tree" as some people believe that Judas Iscariot hanged himself after his betrayal from a related tree Cercis siliquastrum.

Most of us would never consider Redbud as a viable source of wood. I've lived around them my entire life and have never found a piece in the firewood pile. You certainly won't find it in a commercial lumberyard. Large diameter Rebuds are not very common, although the National Register of Big Trees a tree in Jackson, MO that stands 39 feet tall with a circumference of 132 inches (a little math tells me that that is 42 inches in diameter). Wow! That may call for a road trip!

I intend to discuss each subject species over several posts, primarily to allow discoveries of information along the way. This includes information tendered by my readers. If you have personal experience, please feel free to add to this or any discussion in the comments section.

Next time, we will get into a discussion about the wood from the beautiful Redbud.
It just so happens a neighbor is cutting one down, they don't have a long life span and his is rotting and falling over, I'm planing on taking the larger trunks and see how well they do as bandsaw boxes, as for as OK, goes I lived there 2 years during my teen years and as much as I hate to say this, I am so glad I'm not from there, the worst parts of my life and would avoid passing through it if all all possible just due to the negative memories, I am so glad to call Texas my home.
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
23 Posts
Discussion Starter · #23 ·
Redbud #2

The redbud may indeed be the poster child for Discovering Wood. It is one of those woods that you have to kind of "luck into". You can't go to the average lumber supplier and buy 110 board feet. Even small owner-operated mills are rarely going to have Redbud lumber in any quantity, BUT it is a perfect example of the domestic exotics that we can harvest and mill in our own shops.
Flower Plant Daytime Building Botany


I "happened upon" a large redbud trunk early last summer when a storm decimated the over 100-year-old tree standing in my father-in-law's farmyard. The original owner of the property said that her grandfather specifically planted the Redbud sometime in the 1890s. The center of the trunk had been ravaged by ants, termites, or some form of wood-eating insect over the years, and this is probably what ultimately made the trunk susceptible to wind damage.
Brown Wood Trunk Tints and shades Bedrock

The logs had already been bucked into two-foot lengths when I arrived, which precluded any long lumber, but what remained was perfect for home milling. I retained some of the largest chunks and burls for turning blanks (along with any other chunky bits) and milled a fair bit into thin lumber. (More on my process in future posts).

The Numbers:
Specific Gravity-----Density (#/cf)-----Janka Hardness-----"Shrinkage Ratio"
--0.6363----------39.65---------1000?----------???

The reported specific gravity is 0.6363 (comparable to Ash) and density of 39.65 #/cubic foot (comparable to Walnut). I'm trying to figure out exactly what these figures mean. One source implies that specific gravity is the most important predictor of wood strength. I thought it just determined if it would float (ala Salem witch trials). I am equally unsure about the density figure, although I might expect it to relate to hardness or dent resistance. If you have any insight, please let me know. The other figure I came across is the Janka hardness scale (measured in pounds (or kilograms) of force required to press a roughly ½" diameter steel ball into the wood ¼"), although I have been unable to find a Janka number for Redbud. If the Janka number correlates in any way with density, then we might assume that Redbud's Janka is approximately 1000 (ie. softer than Red Oak but harder than Red Cedar) which is about how I would say that it behaves.

The other thing I have noticed is that Redbud has a tendency to split as it dries (even when the endgrain is sealed). I have not had this issue with boards (although my boards are approx. ½" thick), but chunks left for turning are prone to split. I am still working out what numbers would lend a predictability to this tendency. On other species, I have seen numbers for the percentage of shrinkage from green to dry (both tangential and radial); perhaps the predictor is a ratio of these two numbers, as it would define shrinkage stresses. I will investigate this further. For now, let's call this the "shrinkage ratio".

Please bear with me as I compile and define some of these "technical" details.
Brown Natural material Wood Beige Flooring


On the practical side:
The most surprising thing about Redbud is the color. The wood is a mid to dark brown with streaks of red, yellow, and chocolate brown. It is stunning. There are surely growing condition and soil composition factors that determine how the wood ultimately looks. I don't know what those are, but I have seen an array of appearances in Redbud lumber from different sources. I found the wood to be fairly fine-grained. It is a little harder to carve than Black Walnut, but it does hold crisp detail.
Brown Sleeve Natural material Artifact Beige

Helmet Hat Couch Sleeve Wood

"Redbud Leaves" 2010

On an interesting note, Hoadley mentions Redbud among a handful of other specieswhich fluoresce under ultraviolet light. I bought a "blacklight" light bulb from Home Depot and had a lot of fun looking at different woods (I have several of the species); most fluoresce yellow and are really cool to look at but very difficult to photograph. I can only imagine how it would look under a more powerful UV source, such as a woods lamp.
Water Cloud Sky Tints and shades Horizon
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
46 Posts
Redbud #2

The redbud may indeed be the poster child for Discovering Wood. It is one of those woods that you have to kind of "luck into". You can't go to the average lumber supplier and buy 110 board feet. Even small owner-operated mills are rarely going to have Redbud lumber in any quantity, BUT it is a perfect example of the domestic exotics that we can harvest and mill in our own shops.
Flower Plant Daytime Building Botany


I "happened upon" a large redbud trunk early last summer when a storm decimated the over 100-year-old tree standing in my father-in-law's farmyard. The original owner of the property said that her grandfather specifically planted the Redbud sometime in the 1890s. The center of the trunk had been ravaged by ants, termites, or some form of wood-eating insect over the years, and this is probably what ultimately made the trunk susceptible to wind damage.
Brown Wood Trunk Tints and shades Bedrock

The logs had already been bucked into two-foot lengths when I arrived, which precluded any long lumber, but what remained was perfect for home milling. I retained some of the largest chunks and burls for turning blanks (along with any other chunky bits) and milled a fair bit into thin lumber. (More on my process in future posts).

The Numbers:
Specific Gravity-----Density (#/cf)-----Janka Hardness-----"Shrinkage Ratio"
--0.6363----------39.65---------1000?----------???

The reported specific gravity is 0.6363 (comparable to Ash) and density of 39.65 #/cubic foot (comparable to Walnut). I'm trying to figure out exactly what these figures mean. One source implies that specific gravity is the most important predictor of wood strength. I thought it just determined if it would float (ala Salem witch trials). I am equally unsure about the density figure, although I might expect it to relate to hardness or dent resistance. If you have any insight, please let me know. The other figure I came across is the Janka hardness scale (measured in pounds (or kilograms) of force required to press a roughly ½" diameter steel ball into the wood ¼"), although I have been unable to find a Janka number for Redbud. If the Janka number correlates in any way with density, then we might assume that Redbud's Janka is approximately 1000 (ie. softer than Red Oak but harder than Red Cedar) which is about how I would say that it behaves.

The other thing I have noticed is that Redbud has a tendency to split as it dries (even when the endgrain is sealed). I have not had this issue with boards (although my boards are approx. ½" thick), but chunks left for turning are prone to split. I am still working out what numbers would lend a predictability to this tendency. On other species, I have seen numbers for the percentage of shrinkage from green to dry (both tangential and radial); perhaps the predictor is a ratio of these two numbers, as it would define shrinkage stresses. I will investigate this further. For now, let's call this the "shrinkage ratio".

Please bear with me as I compile and define some of these "technical" details.
Brown Natural material Wood Beige Flooring


On the practical side:
The most surprising thing about Redbud is the color. The wood is a mid to dark brown with streaks of red, yellow, and chocolate brown. It is stunning. There are surely growing condition and soil composition factors that determine how the wood ultimately looks. I don't know what those are, but I have seen an array of appearances in Redbud lumber from different sources. I found the wood to be fairly fine-grained. It is a little harder to carve than Black Walnut, but it does hold crisp detail.
Brown Sleeve Natural material Artifact Beige

Helmet Hat Couch Sleeve Wood

"Redbud Leaves" 2010

On an interesting note, Hoadley mentions Redbud among a handful of other specieswhich fluoresce under ultraviolet light. I bought a "blacklight" light bulb from Home Depot and had a lot of fun looking at different woods (I have several of the species); most fluoresce yellow and are really cool to look at but very difficult to photograph. I can only imagine how it would look under a more powerful UV source, such as a woods lamp.
Water Cloud Sky Tints and shades Horizon
I have two 50 yr. old redbuds on the treelawn of my suburban yard and they are not doing well. They'll have to come down soon and I was wondering if harvesting turning blanks would be worthwhile. The trunks are twisted, are loaded with small burls and have been ravaged by insects over the years. Thank you for doing the research and posting.
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,733 Posts
Redbud #2

The redbud may indeed be the poster child for Discovering Wood. It is one of those woods that you have to kind of "luck into". You can't go to the average lumber supplier and buy 110 board feet. Even small owner-operated mills are rarely going to have Redbud lumber in any quantity, BUT it is a perfect example of the domestic exotics that we can harvest and mill in our own shops.
Flower Plant Daytime Building Botany


I "happened upon" a large redbud trunk early last summer when a storm decimated the over 100-year-old tree standing in my father-in-law's farmyard. The original owner of the property said that her grandfather specifically planted the Redbud sometime in the 1890s. The center of the trunk had been ravaged by ants, termites, or some form of wood-eating insect over the years, and this is probably what ultimately made the trunk susceptible to wind damage.
Brown Wood Trunk Tints and shades Bedrock

The logs had already been bucked into two-foot lengths when I arrived, which precluded any long lumber, but what remained was perfect for home milling. I retained some of the largest chunks and burls for turning blanks (along with any other chunky bits) and milled a fair bit into thin lumber. (More on my process in future posts).

The Numbers:
Specific Gravity-----Density (#/cf)-----Janka Hardness-----"Shrinkage Ratio"
--0.6363----------39.65---------1000?----------???

The reported specific gravity is 0.6363 (comparable to Ash) and density of 39.65 #/cubic foot (comparable to Walnut). I'm trying to figure out exactly what these figures mean. One source implies that specific gravity is the most important predictor of wood strength. I thought it just determined if it would float (ala Salem witch trials). I am equally unsure about the density figure, although I might expect it to relate to hardness or dent resistance. If you have any insight, please let me know. The other figure I came across is the Janka hardness scale (measured in pounds (or kilograms) of force required to press a roughly ½" diameter steel ball into the wood ¼"), although I have been unable to find a Janka number for Redbud. If the Janka number correlates in any way with density, then we might assume that Redbud's Janka is approximately 1000 (ie. softer than Red Oak but harder than Red Cedar) which is about how I would say that it behaves.

The other thing I have noticed is that Redbud has a tendency to split as it dries (even when the endgrain is sealed). I have not had this issue with boards (although my boards are approx. ½" thick), but chunks left for turning are prone to split. I am still working out what numbers would lend a predictability to this tendency. On other species, I have seen numbers for the percentage of shrinkage from green to dry (both tangential and radial); perhaps the predictor is a ratio of these two numbers, as it would define shrinkage stresses. I will investigate this further. For now, let's call this the "shrinkage ratio".

Please bear with me as I compile and define some of these "technical" details.
Brown Natural material Wood Beige Flooring


On the practical side:
The most surprising thing about Redbud is the color. The wood is a mid to dark brown with streaks of red, yellow, and chocolate brown. It is stunning. There are surely growing condition and soil composition factors that determine how the wood ultimately looks. I don't know what those are, but I have seen an array of appearances in Redbud lumber from different sources. I found the wood to be fairly fine-grained. It is a little harder to carve than Black Walnut, but it does hold crisp detail.
Brown Sleeve Natural material Artifact Beige

Helmet Hat Couch Sleeve Wood

"Redbud Leaves" 2010

On an interesting note, Hoadley mentions Redbud among a handful of other specieswhich fluoresce under ultraviolet light. I bought a "blacklight" light bulb from Home Depot and had a lot of fun looking at different woods (I have several of the species); most fluoresce yellow and are really cool to look at but very difficult to photograph. I can only imagine how it would look under a more powerful UV source, such as a woods lamp.
Water Cloud Sky Tints and shades Horizon
fascinating.
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
54 Posts
Redbud #2

The redbud may indeed be the poster child for Discovering Wood. It is one of those woods that you have to kind of "luck into". You can't go to the average lumber supplier and buy 110 board feet. Even small owner-operated mills are rarely going to have Redbud lumber in any quantity, BUT it is a perfect example of the domestic exotics that we can harvest and mill in our own shops.


I "happened upon" a large redbud trunk early last summer when a storm decimated the over 100-year-old tree standing in my father-in-law's farmyard. The original owner of the property said that her grandfather specifically planted the Redbud sometime in the 1890s. The center of the trunk had been ravaged by ants, termites, or some form of wood-eating insect over the years, and this is probably what ultimately made the trunk susceptible to wind damage.

The logs had already been bucked into two-foot lengths when I arrived, which precluded any long lumber, but what remained was perfect for home milling. I retained some of the largest chunks and burls for turning blanks (along with any other chunky bits) and milled a fair bit into thin lumber. (More on my process in future posts).

The Numbers:
Specific Gravity-----Density (#/cf)-----Janka Hardness-----"Shrinkage Ratio"
--0.6363----------39.65---------1000?----------???

The reported specific gravity is 0.6363 (comparable to Ash) and density of 39.65 #/cubic foot (comparable to Walnut). I'm trying to figure out exactly what these figures mean. One source implies that specific gravity is the most important predictor of wood strength. I thought it just determined if it would float (ala Salem witch trials). I am equally unsure about the density figure, although I might expect it to relate to hardness or dent resistance. If you have any insight, please let me know. The other figure I came across is the Janka hardness scale (measured in pounds (or kilograms) of force required to press a roughly ½" diameter steel ball into the wood ¼"), although I have been unable to find a Janka number for Redbud. If the Janka number correlates in any way with density, then we might assume that Redbud's Janka is approximately 1000 (ie. softer than Red Oak but harder than Red Cedar) which is about how I would say that it behaves.

The other thing I have noticed is that Redbud has a tendency to split as it dries (even when the endgrain is sealed). I have not had this issue with boards (although my boards are approx. ½" thick), but chunks left for turning are prone to split. I am still working out what numbers would lend a predictability to this tendency. On other species, I have seen numbers for the percentage of shrinkage from green to dry (both tangential and radial); perhaps the predictor is a ratio of these two numbers, as it would define shrinkage stresses. I will investigate this further. For now, let's call this the "shrinkage ratio".

Please bear with me as I compile and define some of these "technical" details.


On the practical side:
The most surprising thing about Redbud is the color. The wood is a mid to dark brown with streaks of red, yellow, and chocolate brown. It is stunning. There are surely growing condition and soil composition factors that determine how the wood ultimately looks. I don't know what those are, but I have seen an array of appearances in Redbud lumber from different sources. I found the wood to be fairly fine-grained. It is a little harder to carve than Black Walnut, but it does hold crisp detail.


"Redbud Leaves" 2010

On an interesting note, Hoadley mentions Redbud among a handful of other specieswhich fluoresce under ultraviolet light. I bought a "blacklight" light bulb from Home Depot and had a lot of fun looking at different woods (I have several of the species); most fluoresce yellow and are really cool to look at but very difficult to photograph. I can only imagine how it would look under a more powerful UV source, such as a woods lamp.
I've used this wood for making boxes and it is beautiful. Very red with streaks of black and yellow.
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
23 Posts
Discussion Starter · #27 ·
Bradford Pear

While I have been posting duplicate posts of my blog Discovering Wood here at LJ, I have decided to post a text only version here. I try to post picture heavy blogs, and the extra time involved in re-posting the pics is frankly not a good use of time. Please visit Discovering Wood the complete post with pictures.

Bradford Pear

I apologize for the infrequent posts, but I've been doing a great deal of research lately. I am still trying to wrap my head around the statistical information I am finding for each species. What do these numbers truly mean to me the woodworker and how will they aid my understanding of a species that I have yet to work with?

One of the trees that I planned to discuss is the Bradford Pear (Pyrus calleryana). I have a love/hate relationship with this tree. It is one of the species that is hard to find concrete numbers on, and, for this reason, I was planning to delay posting about it even though it is a great follow up to the Redbud, but this week changed my plans.

My home state of Oklahoma is well known for its windiness, but Friday April 15, 2011, was ridiculous! We had 40 mph sustained winds, with confirmed gusts to 70+ mph!!! Are you beginning to see where this is headed?

We have (had) two straggly Pears along our driveway that we should have removed years ago, but they are blocking the view of a telephone pole. Friday, half of one of the trees collided with our house. That was the last straw. I promptly felled the remainder of that tree (and its neighbor). Twenty-four hours later the trees are completely gone. The stumps have been ground. The lawn has been repaired. And the wood has been cut into turning blanks and sealed with Anchorseal. It was not how I had intended to spend my Friday and Saturday, and while the entire episode perfectly illustrates all that I hate about this species, I am quite excited by all of the Pear wood that I now have!

As I said, I have a love/hate relationship with Bradford Pear. I love it once it is wood, but there are so many things that I hate about it as a tree. I try to avoid being negative, but what follows is a short list of my grievances.

First off, let me say that I am using the term "Bradford" Pear quite loosely. They are generically "Callery" Pears with many cultivars, which are supposed to be an improvement to the flowering pear. "Bradford" just seems to be the most common varietal planted around here.

This brings me to my first gripe. This tree has been overplanted in the suburban landscape, at least where I live. I don't know if landscape architects were initially to blame or if the popularity coincided with the rise of the home improvement big box store, but these trees are everywhere. Granted, they are quite striking with their profuse white flowers in the early spring, but the flowers are absolutely putrid smelling, with an odor similar to decaying flesh. I have even heard that the nectar within these flowers is so thin and of such little value that honeybees will bypass the Bradford unless they have no other options.

My second gripe is that each of these flowers produces a small hard berry (presumably some sort of berry-shaped pear), but interestingly, I have never seen these consumed by birds or other wildlife. They simply rot on the tree and drop off in the late fall, leaving behind a royal, slimy, nasty mess.

My third gripe is that the overall canopy shape is nearly identical from tree to tree. They remind me of a bunch of lollipops jammed into the ground in Candyland. They have very little character!

My fourth gripe is that they are notoriously short lived, with a reported average lifespan of 25 years. Huh…guess how many growth rings my trees had!!! Bradfords must have been very popular in 1986, because there are many mature specimen around here that now look distressed.

The fifth gripe may correlate with the fourth - the wood is brittle. You can count on severe tree damage with any ice storm or wind event. And that is where I stand today. I will discuss this more when I post about the actual wood, but Pear has a very high specific gravity (0.73), which is comparable to Persimmon and only slightly less than Hedge (our hardest domestic hardwood). This may be why the tree is considered brittle. The wood may be too strong to bend and, instead, ruptures catastrophically.

Identification
:

The tree has simple alternate leaves of about 2 ½" with a waxy/shiny appearance and subtly serrated margins.

The bark is smooth and dark gray on young trees and twigs but develops to become neatly and narrowly furrowed.

The fall foliage ranges from orange to purple.

More about the wood of the Bradford in the next post.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
184 Posts
Bradford Pear

While I have been posting duplicate posts of my blog Discovering Wood here at LJ, I have decided to post a text only version here. I try to post picture heavy blogs, and the extra time involved in re-posting the pics is frankly not a good use of time. Please visit Discovering Wood the complete post with pictures.

Bradford Pear

I apologize for the infrequent posts, but I've been doing a great deal of research lately. I am still trying to wrap my head around the statistical information I am finding for each species. What do these numbers truly mean to me the woodworker and how will they aid my understanding of a species that I have yet to work with?

One of the trees that I planned to discuss is the Bradford Pear (Pyrus calleryana). I have a love/hate relationship with this tree. It is one of the species that is hard to find concrete numbers on, and, for this reason, I was planning to delay posting about it even though it is a great follow up to the Redbud, but this week changed my plans.

My home state of Oklahoma is well known for its windiness, but Friday April 15, 2011, was ridiculous! We had 40 mph sustained winds, with confirmed gusts to 70+ mph!!! Are you beginning to see where this is headed?

We have (had) two straggly Pears along our driveway that we should have removed years ago, but they are blocking the view of a telephone pole. Friday, half of one of the trees collided with our house. That was the last straw. I promptly felled the remainder of that tree (and its neighbor). Twenty-four hours later the trees are completely gone. The stumps have been ground. The lawn has been repaired. And the wood has been cut into turning blanks and sealed with Anchorseal. It was not how I had intended to spend my Friday and Saturday, and while the entire episode perfectly illustrates all that I hate about this species, I am quite excited by all of the Pear wood that I now have!

As I said, I have a love/hate relationship with Bradford Pear. I love it once it is wood, but there are so many things that I hate about it as a tree. I try to avoid being negative, but what follows is a short list of my grievances.

First off, let me say that I am using the term "Bradford" Pear quite loosely. They are generically "Callery" Pears with many cultivars, which are supposed to be an improvement to the flowering pear. "Bradford" just seems to be the most common varietal planted around here.

This brings me to my first gripe. This tree has been overplanted in the suburban landscape, at least where I live. I don't know if landscape architects were initially to blame or if the popularity coincided with the rise of the home improvement big box store, but these trees are everywhere. Granted, they are quite striking with their profuse white flowers in the early spring, but the flowers are absolutely putrid smelling, with an odor similar to decaying flesh. I have even heard that the nectar within these flowers is so thin and of such little value that honeybees will bypass the Bradford unless they have no other options.

My second gripe is that each of these flowers produces a small hard berry (presumably some sort of berry-shaped pear), but interestingly, I have never seen these consumed by birds or other wildlife. They simply rot on the tree and drop off in the late fall, leaving behind a royal, slimy, nasty mess.

My third gripe is that the overall canopy shape is nearly identical from tree to tree. They remind me of a bunch of lollipops jammed into the ground in Candyland. They have very little character!

My fourth gripe is that they are notoriously short lived, with a reported average lifespan of 25 years. Huh…guess how many growth rings my trees had!!! Bradfords must have been very popular in 1986, because there are many mature specimen around here that now look distressed.

The fifth gripe may correlate with the fourth - the wood is brittle. You can count on severe tree damage with any ice storm or wind event. And that is where I stand today. I will discuss this more when I post about the actual wood, but Pear has a very high specific gravity (0.73), which is comparable to Persimmon and only slightly less than Hedge (our hardest domestic hardwood). This may be why the tree is considered brittle. The wood may be too strong to bend and, instead, ruptures catastrophically.

Identification
:

The tree has simple alternate leaves of about 2 ½" with a waxy/shiny appearance and subtly serrated margins.

The bark is smooth and dark gray on young trees and twigs but develops to become neatly and narrowly furrowed.

The fall foliage ranges from orange to purple.

More about the wood of the Bradford in the next post.
Hi Doc. Greetings from Norman. I can assure you that birds do eat those little berries from the Bradfor Pear trees. Until I cut mine down a few years ago I had plenty evidence of that with the purple blobs of bird poop I was constantlly washing off my white Silverado. The birds don't eat them all though as I'm quite familiar with the mess those berries leave on the sidewalks around here in the fall. I didn't have a lathe back when I cut that tree down so I never saved any of the wood. I would now though. Collecting wood to turn has become a bit of an addiction. Thanks for the informative post.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
46 Posts
Bradford Pear

While I have been posting duplicate posts of my blog Discovering Wood here at LJ, I have decided to post a text only version here. I try to post picture heavy blogs, and the extra time involved in re-posting the pics is frankly not a good use of time. Please visit Discovering Wood the complete post with pictures.

Bradford Pear

I apologize for the infrequent posts, but I've been doing a great deal of research lately. I am still trying to wrap my head around the statistical information I am finding for each species. What do these numbers truly mean to me the woodworker and how will they aid my understanding of a species that I have yet to work with?

One of the trees that I planned to discuss is the Bradford Pear (Pyrus calleryana). I have a love/hate relationship with this tree. It is one of the species that is hard to find concrete numbers on, and, for this reason, I was planning to delay posting about it even though it is a great follow up to the Redbud, but this week changed my plans.

My home state of Oklahoma is well known for its windiness, but Friday April 15, 2011, was ridiculous! We had 40 mph sustained winds, with confirmed gusts to 70+ mph!!! Are you beginning to see where this is headed?

We have (had) two straggly Pears along our driveway that we should have removed years ago, but they are blocking the view of a telephone pole. Friday, half of one of the trees collided with our house. That was the last straw. I promptly felled the remainder of that tree (and its neighbor). Twenty-four hours later the trees are completely gone. The stumps have been ground. The lawn has been repaired. And the wood has been cut into turning blanks and sealed with Anchorseal. It was not how I had intended to spend my Friday and Saturday, and while the entire episode perfectly illustrates all that I hate about this species, I am quite excited by all of the Pear wood that I now have!

As I said, I have a love/hate relationship with Bradford Pear. I love it once it is wood, but there are so many things that I hate about it as a tree. I try to avoid being negative, but what follows is a short list of my grievances.

First off, let me say that I am using the term "Bradford" Pear quite loosely. They are generically "Callery" Pears with many cultivars, which are supposed to be an improvement to the flowering pear. "Bradford" just seems to be the most common varietal planted around here.

This brings me to my first gripe. This tree has been overplanted in the suburban landscape, at least where I live. I don't know if landscape architects were initially to blame or if the popularity coincided with the rise of the home improvement big box store, but these trees are everywhere. Granted, they are quite striking with their profuse white flowers in the early spring, but the flowers are absolutely putrid smelling, with an odor similar to decaying flesh. I have even heard that the nectar within these flowers is so thin and of such little value that honeybees will bypass the Bradford unless they have no other options.

My second gripe is that each of these flowers produces a small hard berry (presumably some sort of berry-shaped pear), but interestingly, I have never seen these consumed by birds or other wildlife. They simply rot on the tree and drop off in the late fall, leaving behind a royal, slimy, nasty mess.

My third gripe is that the overall canopy shape is nearly identical from tree to tree. They remind me of a bunch of lollipops jammed into the ground in Candyland. They have very little character!

My fourth gripe is that they are notoriously short lived, with a reported average lifespan of 25 years. Huh…guess how many growth rings my trees had!!! Bradfords must have been very popular in 1986, because there are many mature specimen around here that now look distressed.

The fifth gripe may correlate with the fourth - the wood is brittle. You can count on severe tree damage with any ice storm or wind event. And that is where I stand today. I will discuss this more when I post about the actual wood, but Pear has a very high specific gravity (0.73), which is comparable to Persimmon and only slightly less than Hedge (our hardest domestic hardwood). This may be why the tree is considered brittle. The wood may be too strong to bend and, instead, ruptures catastrophically.

Identification
:

The tree has simple alternate leaves of about 2 ½" with a waxy/shiny appearance and subtly serrated margins.

The bark is smooth and dark gray on young trees and twigs but develops to become neatly and narrowly furrowed.

The fall foliage ranges from orange to purple.

More about the wood of the Bradford in the next post.
Flowerpot Vase Serveware Urn Porcelain


The only pear I have ever turned, finished out very pale, almost white. After 9 months or so the color darkened to a very rich and attractive (I think) brown that looks great on our hutch. I know what you mean about the tree itself, though. I think the landscapers see a quick grow, a flower in the spring and fairly thick leaf growth which helps sell a new neighborhood. Mine split at the crotch one still, calm Saturday afternoon, completely unprovoked. Surprised the heck out of me. Thanks for posting.
Sorry about the enormous pic, I wasn't able to figure out how to make it any smaller.
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
496 Posts
Bradford Pear

While I have been posting duplicate posts of my blog Discovering Wood here at LJ, I have decided to post a text only version here. I try to post picture heavy blogs, and the extra time involved in re-posting the pics is frankly not a good use of time. Please visit Discovering Wood the complete post with pictures.

Bradford Pear

I apologize for the infrequent posts, but I've been doing a great deal of research lately. I am still trying to wrap my head around the statistical information I am finding for each species. What do these numbers truly mean to me the woodworker and how will they aid my understanding of a species that I have yet to work with?

One of the trees that I planned to discuss is the Bradford Pear (Pyrus calleryana). I have a love/hate relationship with this tree. It is one of the species that is hard to find concrete numbers on, and, for this reason, I was planning to delay posting about it even though it is a great follow up to the Redbud, but this week changed my plans.

My home state of Oklahoma is well known for its windiness, but Friday April 15, 2011, was ridiculous! We had 40 mph sustained winds, with confirmed gusts to 70+ mph!!! Are you beginning to see where this is headed?

We have (had) two straggly Pears along our driveway that we should have removed years ago, but they are blocking the view of a telephone pole. Friday, half of one of the trees collided with our house. That was the last straw. I promptly felled the remainder of that tree (and its neighbor). Twenty-four hours later the trees are completely gone. The stumps have been ground. The lawn has been repaired. And the wood has been cut into turning blanks and sealed with Anchorseal. It was not how I had intended to spend my Friday and Saturday, and while the entire episode perfectly illustrates all that I hate about this species, I am quite excited by all of the Pear wood that I now have!

As I said, I have a love/hate relationship with Bradford Pear. I love it once it is wood, but there are so many things that I hate about it as a tree. I try to avoid being negative, but what follows is a short list of my grievances.

First off, let me say that I am using the term "Bradford" Pear quite loosely. They are generically "Callery" Pears with many cultivars, which are supposed to be an improvement to the flowering pear. "Bradford" just seems to be the most common varietal planted around here.

This brings me to my first gripe. This tree has been overplanted in the suburban landscape, at least where I live. I don't know if landscape architects were initially to blame or if the popularity coincided with the rise of the home improvement big box store, but these trees are everywhere. Granted, they are quite striking with their profuse white flowers in the early spring, but the flowers are absolutely putrid smelling, with an odor similar to decaying flesh. I have even heard that the nectar within these flowers is so thin and of such little value that honeybees will bypass the Bradford unless they have no other options.

My second gripe is that each of these flowers produces a small hard berry (presumably some sort of berry-shaped pear), but interestingly, I have never seen these consumed by birds or other wildlife. They simply rot on the tree and drop off in the late fall, leaving behind a royal, slimy, nasty mess.

My third gripe is that the overall canopy shape is nearly identical from tree to tree. They remind me of a bunch of lollipops jammed into the ground in Candyland. They have very little character!

My fourth gripe is that they are notoriously short lived, with a reported average lifespan of 25 years. Huh…guess how many growth rings my trees had!!! Bradfords must have been very popular in 1986, because there are many mature specimen around here that now look distressed.

The fifth gripe may correlate with the fourth - the wood is brittle. You can count on severe tree damage with any ice storm or wind event. And that is where I stand today. I will discuss this more when I post about the actual wood, but Pear has a very high specific gravity (0.73), which is comparable to Persimmon and only slightly less than Hedge (our hardest domestic hardwood). This may be why the tree is considered brittle. The wood may be too strong to bend and, instead, ruptures catastrophically.

Identification
:

The tree has simple alternate leaves of about 2 ½" with a waxy/shiny appearance and subtly serrated margins.

The bark is smooth and dark gray on young trees and twigs but develops to become neatly and narrowly furrowed.

The fall foliage ranges from orange to purple.

More about the wood of the Bradford in the next post.
My street in North Carolina was lined with Bradfords when we moved in twenty years ago. The street was beautiful in spring when they were all flowering. Today after many strong wind storms and a few ice storms I have the only one left. The trees with short trunks seemed to be the ones that were vulnerable. Mine has a trunk that's over six feet high. I looked at the wood from several of these trees and didn't think about saving any. Not being a wood turner I didn't think there was enough wood there to build anything. Perhaps when my remaining specimen falls I'll get something useful to me. By the way, because they're known to be fragile, no one plants them around here any more.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
13 Posts
Bradford Pear

While I have been posting duplicate posts of my blog Discovering Wood here at LJ, I have decided to post a text only version here. I try to post picture heavy blogs, and the extra time involved in re-posting the pics is frankly not a good use of time. Please visit Discovering Wood the complete post with pictures.

Bradford Pear

I apologize for the infrequent posts, but I've been doing a great deal of research lately. I am still trying to wrap my head around the statistical information I am finding for each species. What do these numbers truly mean to me the woodworker and how will they aid my understanding of a species that I have yet to work with?

One of the trees that I planned to discuss is the Bradford Pear (Pyrus calleryana). I have a love/hate relationship with this tree. It is one of the species that is hard to find concrete numbers on, and, for this reason, I was planning to delay posting about it even though it is a great follow up to the Redbud, but this week changed my plans.

My home state of Oklahoma is well known for its windiness, but Friday April 15, 2011, was ridiculous! We had 40 mph sustained winds, with confirmed gusts to 70+ mph!!! Are you beginning to see where this is headed?

We have (had) two straggly Pears along our driveway that we should have removed years ago, but they are blocking the view of a telephone pole. Friday, half of one of the trees collided with our house. That was the last straw. I promptly felled the remainder of that tree (and its neighbor). Twenty-four hours later the trees are completely gone. The stumps have been ground. The lawn has been repaired. And the wood has been cut into turning blanks and sealed with Anchorseal. It was not how I had intended to spend my Friday and Saturday, and while the entire episode perfectly illustrates all that I hate about this species, I am quite excited by all of the Pear wood that I now have!

As I said, I have a love/hate relationship with Bradford Pear. I love it once it is wood, but there are so many things that I hate about it as a tree. I try to avoid being negative, but what follows is a short list of my grievances.

First off, let me say that I am using the term "Bradford" Pear quite loosely. They are generically "Callery" Pears with many cultivars, which are supposed to be an improvement to the flowering pear. "Bradford" just seems to be the most common varietal planted around here.

This brings me to my first gripe. This tree has been overplanted in the suburban landscape, at least where I live. I don't know if landscape architects were initially to blame or if the popularity coincided with the rise of the home improvement big box store, but these trees are everywhere. Granted, they are quite striking with their profuse white flowers in the early spring, but the flowers are absolutely putrid smelling, with an odor similar to decaying flesh. I have even heard that the nectar within these flowers is so thin and of such little value that honeybees will bypass the Bradford unless they have no other options.

My second gripe is that each of these flowers produces a small hard berry (presumably some sort of berry-shaped pear), but interestingly, I have never seen these consumed by birds or other wildlife. They simply rot on the tree and drop off in the late fall, leaving behind a royal, slimy, nasty mess.

My third gripe is that the overall canopy shape is nearly identical from tree to tree. They remind me of a bunch of lollipops jammed into the ground in Candyland. They have very little character!

My fourth gripe is that they are notoriously short lived, with a reported average lifespan of 25 years. Huh…guess how many growth rings my trees had!!! Bradfords must have been very popular in 1986, because there are many mature specimen around here that now look distressed.

The fifth gripe may correlate with the fourth - the wood is brittle. You can count on severe tree damage with any ice storm or wind event. And that is where I stand today. I will discuss this more when I post about the actual wood, but Pear has a very high specific gravity (0.73), which is comparable to Persimmon and only slightly less than Hedge (our hardest domestic hardwood). This may be why the tree is considered brittle. The wood may be too strong to bend and, instead, ruptures catastrophically.

Identification
:

The tree has simple alternate leaves of about 2 ½" with a waxy/shiny appearance and subtly serrated margins.

The bark is smooth and dark gray on young trees and twigs but develops to become neatly and narrowly furrowed.

The fall foliage ranges from orange to purple.

More about the wood of the Bradford in the next post.
DocT -

I realize that you posted this a number of years ago but I was recently researching a project where I was going to use Bradford pear, saw it and thought I would comment.

I grew up in University Park, MD blocks from the University of Maryland and a few miles from the US Agricultural Center in Beltsville MD. The Bradford Pear tree was developed at Beltsville. In the late 50's (as I remember) the center wanted to plant the trees in a development to see how they faired. They selected University Park. Initially they were very nice looking and acting trees. National Geographic Magazine did a short article about them (our street was featured on one page while the trees were in bloom). After a number of years and growth in size the trees began to show their ugly side. Storms would break limbs leaving the trees disfigured. The root systems would surface and push up sidewalks. I never really never notice the bad odors.

As a result (over time) most of the trees were cut down because they were so disfigured. There are still a few left in the neighborhood but they don't look very good and have been replaced with other species.

When the city started to cut down the trees I was able to get a hold of a number of trunks. Some of them were up to 24 inches in diameter and 6 feet long. I had them slab cut and stickered to air dry. They have been drying now for about 30 years. They are in great shape.

One last note: The trees were suppose to be sterile and not able to reproduce. Beltsville was wrong. They are everywhere in the wild.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
488 Posts
Bradford Pear

While I have been posting duplicate posts of my blog Discovering Wood here at LJ, I have decided to post a text only version here. I try to post picture heavy blogs, and the extra time involved in re-posting the pics is frankly not a good use of time. Please visit Discovering Wood the complete post with pictures.

Bradford Pear

I apologize for the infrequent posts, but I've been doing a great deal of research lately. I am still trying to wrap my head around the statistical information I am finding for each species. What do these numbers truly mean to me the woodworker and how will they aid my understanding of a species that I have yet to work with?

One of the trees that I planned to discuss is the Bradford Pear (Pyrus calleryana). I have a love/hate relationship with this tree. It is one of the species that is hard to find concrete numbers on, and, for this reason, I was planning to delay posting about it even though it is a great follow up to the Redbud, but this week changed my plans.

My home state of Oklahoma is well known for its windiness, but Friday April 15, 2011, was ridiculous! We had 40 mph sustained winds, with confirmed gusts to 70+ mph!!! Are you beginning to see where this is headed?

We have (had) two straggly Pears along our driveway that we should have removed years ago, but they are blocking the view of a telephone pole. Friday, half of one of the trees collided with our house. That was the last straw. I promptly felled the remainder of that tree (and its neighbor). Twenty-four hours later the trees are completely gone. The stumps have been ground. The lawn has been repaired. And the wood has been cut into turning blanks and sealed with Anchorseal. It was not how I had intended to spend my Friday and Saturday, and while the entire episode perfectly illustrates all that I hate about this species, I am quite excited by all of the Pear wood that I now have!

As I said, I have a love/hate relationship with Bradford Pear. I love it once it is wood, but there are so many things that I hate about it as a tree. I try to avoid being negative, but what follows is a short list of my grievances.

First off, let me say that I am using the term "Bradford" Pear quite loosely. They are generically "Callery" Pears with many cultivars, which are supposed to be an improvement to the flowering pear. "Bradford" just seems to be the most common varietal planted around here.

This brings me to my first gripe. This tree has been overplanted in the suburban landscape, at least where I live. I don't know if landscape architects were initially to blame or if the popularity coincided with the rise of the home improvement big box store, but these trees are everywhere. Granted, they are quite striking with their profuse white flowers in the early spring, but the flowers are absolutely putrid smelling, with an odor similar to decaying flesh. I have even heard that the nectar within these flowers is so thin and of such little value that honeybees will bypass the Bradford unless they have no other options.

My second gripe is that each of these flowers produces a small hard berry (presumably some sort of berry-shaped pear), but interestingly, I have never seen these consumed by birds or other wildlife. They simply rot on the tree and drop off in the late fall, leaving behind a royal, slimy, nasty mess.

My third gripe is that the overall canopy shape is nearly identical from tree to tree. They remind me of a bunch of lollipops jammed into the ground in Candyland. They have very little character!

My fourth gripe is that they are notoriously short lived, with a reported average lifespan of 25 years. Huh…guess how many growth rings my trees had!!! Bradfords must have been very popular in 1986, because there are many mature specimen around here that now look distressed.

The fifth gripe may correlate with the fourth - the wood is brittle. You can count on severe tree damage with any ice storm or wind event. And that is where I stand today. I will discuss this more when I post about the actual wood, but Pear has a very high specific gravity (0.73), which is comparable to Persimmon and only slightly less than Hedge (our hardest domestic hardwood). This may be why the tree is considered brittle. The wood may be too strong to bend and, instead, ruptures catastrophically.

Identification
:

The tree has simple alternate leaves of about 2 ½" with a waxy/shiny appearance and subtly serrated margins.

The bark is smooth and dark gray on young trees and twigs but develops to become neatly and narrowly furrowed.

The fall foliage ranges from orange to purple.

More about the wood of the Bradford in the next post.
my father says the Bradford pear is very hard. think I will make a mallet out of what I have
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
71 Posts
Bradford Pear

While I have been posting duplicate posts of my blog Discovering Wood here at LJ, I have decided to post a text only version here. I try to post picture heavy blogs, and the extra time involved in re-posting the pics is frankly not a good use of time. Please visit Discovering Wood the complete post with pictures.

Bradford Pear

I apologize for the infrequent posts, but I've been doing a great deal of research lately. I am still trying to wrap my head around the statistical information I am finding for each species. What do these numbers truly mean to me the woodworker and how will they aid my understanding of a species that I have yet to work with?

One of the trees that I planned to discuss is the Bradford Pear (Pyrus calleryana). I have a love/hate relationship with this tree. It is one of the species that is hard to find concrete numbers on, and, for this reason, I was planning to delay posting about it even though it is a great follow up to the Redbud, but this week changed my plans.

My home state of Oklahoma is well known for its windiness, but Friday April 15, 2011, was ridiculous! We had 40 mph sustained winds, with confirmed gusts to 70+ mph!!! Are you beginning to see where this is headed?

We have (had) two straggly Pears along our driveway that we should have removed years ago, but they are blocking the view of a telephone pole. Friday, half of one of the trees collided with our house. That was the last straw. I promptly felled the remainder of that tree (and its neighbor). Twenty-four hours later the trees are completely gone. The stumps have been ground. The lawn has been repaired. And the wood has been cut into turning blanks and sealed with Anchorseal. It was not how I had intended to spend my Friday and Saturday, and while the entire episode perfectly illustrates all that I hate about this species, I am quite excited by all of the Pear wood that I now have!

As I said, I have a love/hate relationship with Bradford Pear. I love it once it is wood, but there are so many things that I hate about it as a tree. I try to avoid being negative, but what follows is a short list of my grievances.

First off, let me say that I am using the term "Bradford" Pear quite loosely. They are generically "Callery" Pears with many cultivars, which are supposed to be an improvement to the flowering pear. "Bradford" just seems to be the most common varietal planted around here.

This brings me to my first gripe. This tree has been overplanted in the suburban landscape, at least where I live. I don't know if landscape architects were initially to blame or if the popularity coincided with the rise of the home improvement big box store, but these trees are everywhere. Granted, they are quite striking with their profuse white flowers in the early spring, but the flowers are absolutely putrid smelling, with an odor similar to decaying flesh. I have even heard that the nectar within these flowers is so thin and of such little value that honeybees will bypass the Bradford unless they have no other options.

My second gripe is that each of these flowers produces a small hard berry (presumably some sort of berry-shaped pear), but interestingly, I have never seen these consumed by birds or other wildlife. They simply rot on the tree and drop off in the late fall, leaving behind a royal, slimy, nasty mess.

My third gripe is that the overall canopy shape is nearly identical from tree to tree. They remind me of a bunch of lollipops jammed into the ground in Candyland. They have very little character!

My fourth gripe is that they are notoriously short lived, with a reported average lifespan of 25 years. Huh…guess how many growth rings my trees had!!! Bradfords must have been very popular in 1986, because there are many mature specimen around here that now look distressed.

The fifth gripe may correlate with the fourth - the wood is brittle. You can count on severe tree damage with any ice storm or wind event. And that is where I stand today. I will discuss this more when I post about the actual wood, but Pear has a very high specific gravity (0.73), which is comparable to Persimmon and only slightly less than Hedge (our hardest domestic hardwood). This may be why the tree is considered brittle. The wood may be too strong to bend and, instead, ruptures catastrophically.

Identification
:

The tree has simple alternate leaves of about 2 ½" with a waxy/shiny appearance and subtly serrated margins.

The bark is smooth and dark gray on young trees and twigs but develops to become neatly and narrowly furrowed.

The fall foliage ranges from orange to purple.

More about the wood of the Bradford in the next post.
Just realized we have several heavy logs of it on the front porch nice and dry. They've been there for about 4 years and from what I know of the tree it was dead before it fell. Anyway, the Mrs saved the logs before we meet so I don't know if she'll give me permission to use them for lumber or if she wants them forever as decorations.

I agree..fairly useless as a tree by itself except it produces some oxygen..
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
23 Posts
Discussion Starter · #34 ·
Belated Safety Week 2011 Post

While I have been posting duplicate posts of my blog Discovering Wood at LJ, I have decided to post a text only version here. I try to post picture heavy blogs, and the extra time involved in re-posting the pics is frankly not a good use of time. Please visit Discovering Wood for the complete post with pictures.

Safety Week 2011

I know that I am over a week late for Woodworker's Safety Week, but life has been a bit hectic around my house because of a woodworking-related accident. Warning-while the images presented here are of partially healed wounds, they are still slightly graphic and may be disturbing to some readers…viewer discretion is advised! :}

Life has a way of throwing me curveballs. I talked of the sudden need to remove two large pear trees from my yard in my last post (of nearly one month ago). In my haste to clear the debris from our front-side yard, I dragged several sizeable branches into the backyard, nearer the woodpile, for easier processing and stacking. I knew that with the limbs back there, I could cut it all up when time allowed. They sat there for nearly two weeks. I finally got around to chain-sawing them up on a Saturday afternoon.

I have had my share of close calls in the shop. I have, on occasion, drawn back a hand, fully expecting to see a bloody stump, when all it amounted to was a slight flesh wound. I like to think that the close calls have made me a bit wiser. I actively plan an "exit strategy" when working with power tools. My mind has become adept at processing eventualities, thinking two or three steps ahead and acknowledging the what-ifs. But then I guess that is why they are called accidents, and accidents don't simply befall the unprepared.

I am also keenly aware of the dangers that woodworking offers visitors to my shop. I rarely, if ever, continue working when someone enters my workspace. The uninitiated are often also unaware. On the rare occasion that I allow someone (usually one of my three kids) to stand and watch, I give instruction on where to safely stand, and I usually provide them with eye and ear protection. On the even rarer occasion that I need an extra set of hands when using a power tool (i.e. ripping a sheet of plywood), I only trust my Dad, and now, my well-trained wife, to help. Even when I have a trusted helper, I feel responsible for his/her safety, and my mind begins processing an "exit strategy" for him/her as well. But then I guess that is why they are called accidents, and accidents don't simply befall the unaware.

On that Saturday afternoon, the kids were all watching a video, and my wife happened outside to check on me just as I was heading out to process the limbs.

"Whatcha doing?"

"I'm gonna go ahead and cut up the rest of that Pear. Do you wanna help stack?"

"Sure!"

We proceeded to the backyard, and as I fired up the chainsaw, a thought flashed into my head… "Keep an eye on her!". I began cutting the Pear into firewood lengths, and after a bit of a head start, my lovely wife began to duck in, grab a freshly-cut piece and place it into the stack. Now, a chainsaw is not something to mess with. There are power tools that will hurt you, and then there are power tools that will MANGLE you.

A chainsaw can fall into this second category. I have used a chainsaw quite a bit and have even done several chainsaw carvings. I'm pretty comfortable with one, but I also have a very healthy respect for what can go wrong. I make a conscious effort to not stand in line with the bar in case of kickback; I know the danger zones of the bar that cause kickback; I am watchful of surrounding obstacles that could trip, trap or tangle, and when working in the proximity of someone else, I mentally maintain about a five-foot solitary confinement bubble, my no-fly-zone. I don't want anyone else in the danger zone while I'm running the saw.

My wife was getting perilously close. A thought flashed through my head… "She is not paying attention!" I stood (although I didn't stop the saw) and motioned for her to get behind me and tossed a log to her newly suggested position. Satisfied that danger had been averted, I returned to cutting, pausing after each cut to grab the new piece and toss or "hike" it behind me before cutting another piece.

That is when it happened.

I had just tossed another piece when I suddenly hear an ear-piercing scream from behind me. A scream that could be heard over the sound of the saw and through my ear protection. A scream that brought neighbors running. A scream that was primal to the core. I turned around to find my wife holding a profusely bleeding hand and continuing to scream her head off. We scuttled her around to the shop and got some shop towels on it to stop the bleeding. I couldn't initially understand what had happened and though I hadn't felt the saw make contact with her, I, like the neighbors, was expecting that she had been injured by the chainsaw.

As it turns out, she had been picking up one of the logs when I tossed another toward her without looking. Now I have smashed a finger before, but not like this. Not only was her right ring finger pointing in an odd direction, but the crushing injury had exploded the finger with several lacerations. A trip to our favorite emergent care physician revealed that she had not only fractured the distal aspect of the middle phalanx, but had also severed the extensor tendon.

After two orthopedic consultations and two weeks of complete immobilization, it appears that surgery may be warranted. We will know after a pending consultation with a hand surgeon. At a minimum, we are looking at several more weeks immobilized followed by numerous physical therapy sessions.

My wife is a wonderfully forgiving woman, and while her inattention may have contributed to the accident, I am truly responsible. It turns out that this accident wasn't directly related to the use of woodworking tools, but it serves as a warning of the dangers inherent in all aspects of woodworking. We cannot expect to be completely aware of or fully prepared for ALL the hazards that surround us and our helpers, no matter how many articles we read. But then I guess that is why they are called accidents, and accidents don't simply befall the unread.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
56 Posts
Belated Safety Week 2011 Post

While I have been posting duplicate posts of my blog Discovering Wood at LJ, I have decided to post a text only version here. I try to post picture heavy blogs, and the extra time involved in re-posting the pics is frankly not a good use of time. Please visit Discovering Wood for the complete post with pictures.

Safety Week 2011

I know that I am over a week late for Woodworker's Safety Week, but life has been a bit hectic around my house because of a woodworking-related accident. Warning-while the images presented here are of partially healed wounds, they are still slightly graphic and may be disturbing to some readers…viewer discretion is advised! :}

Life has a way of throwing me curveballs. I talked of the sudden need to remove two large pear trees from my yard in my last post (of nearly one month ago). In my haste to clear the debris from our front-side yard, I dragged several sizeable branches into the backyard, nearer the woodpile, for easier processing and stacking. I knew that with the limbs back there, I could cut it all up when time allowed. They sat there for nearly two weeks. I finally got around to chain-sawing them up on a Saturday afternoon.

I have had my share of close calls in the shop. I have, on occasion, drawn back a hand, fully expecting to see a bloody stump, when all it amounted to was a slight flesh wound. I like to think that the close calls have made me a bit wiser. I actively plan an "exit strategy" when working with power tools. My mind has become adept at processing eventualities, thinking two or three steps ahead and acknowledging the what-ifs. But then I guess that is why they are called accidents, and accidents don't simply befall the unprepared.

I am also keenly aware of the dangers that woodworking offers visitors to my shop. I rarely, if ever, continue working when someone enters my workspace. The uninitiated are often also unaware. On the rare occasion that I allow someone (usually one of my three kids) to stand and watch, I give instruction on where to safely stand, and I usually provide them with eye and ear protection. On the even rarer occasion that I need an extra set of hands when using a power tool (i.e. ripping a sheet of plywood), I only trust my Dad, and now, my well-trained wife, to help. Even when I have a trusted helper, I feel responsible for his/her safety, and my mind begins processing an "exit strategy" for him/her as well. But then I guess that is why they are called accidents, and accidents don't simply befall the unaware.

On that Saturday afternoon, the kids were all watching a video, and my wife happened outside to check on me just as I was heading out to process the limbs.

"Whatcha doing?"

"I'm gonna go ahead and cut up the rest of that Pear. Do you wanna help stack?"

"Sure!"

We proceeded to the backyard, and as I fired up the chainsaw, a thought flashed into my head… "Keep an eye on her!". I began cutting the Pear into firewood lengths, and after a bit of a head start, my lovely wife began to duck in, grab a freshly-cut piece and place it into the stack. Now, a chainsaw is not something to mess with. There are power tools that will hurt you, and then there are power tools that will MANGLE you.

A chainsaw can fall into this second category. I have used a chainsaw quite a bit and have even done several chainsaw carvings. I'm pretty comfortable with one, but I also have a very healthy respect for what can go wrong. I make a conscious effort to not stand in line with the bar in case of kickback; I know the danger zones of the bar that cause kickback; I am watchful of surrounding obstacles that could trip, trap or tangle, and when working in the proximity of someone else, I mentally maintain about a five-foot solitary confinement bubble, my no-fly-zone. I don't want anyone else in the danger zone while I'm running the saw.

My wife was getting perilously close. A thought flashed through my head… "She is not paying attention!" I stood (although I didn't stop the saw) and motioned for her to get behind me and tossed a log to her newly suggested position. Satisfied that danger had been averted, I returned to cutting, pausing after each cut to grab the new piece and toss or "hike" it behind me before cutting another piece.

That is when it happened.

I had just tossed another piece when I suddenly hear an ear-piercing scream from behind me. A scream that could be heard over the sound of the saw and through my ear protection. A scream that brought neighbors running. A scream that was primal to the core. I turned around to find my wife holding a profusely bleeding hand and continuing to scream her head off. We scuttled her around to the shop and got some shop towels on it to stop the bleeding. I couldn't initially understand what had happened and though I hadn't felt the saw make contact with her, I, like the neighbors, was expecting that she had been injured by the chainsaw.

As it turns out, she had been picking up one of the logs when I tossed another toward her without looking. Now I have smashed a finger before, but not like this. Not only was her right ring finger pointing in an odd direction, but the crushing injury had exploded the finger with several lacerations. A trip to our favorite emergent care physician revealed that she had not only fractured the distal aspect of the middle phalanx, but had also severed the extensor tendon.

After two orthopedic consultations and two weeks of complete immobilization, it appears that surgery may be warranted. We will know after a pending consultation with a hand surgeon. At a minimum, we are looking at several more weeks immobilized followed by numerous physical therapy sessions.

My wife is a wonderfully forgiving woman, and while her inattention may have contributed to the accident, I am truly responsible. It turns out that this accident wasn't directly related to the use of woodworking tools, but it serves as a warning of the dangers inherent in all aspects of woodworking. We cannot expect to be completely aware of or fully prepared for ALL the hazards that surround us and our helpers, no matter how many articles we read. But then I guess that is why they are called accidents, and accidents don't simply befall the unread.
My wife and I were just talking safety today and about how when I am in my shop, even I don't know all the hazards, but for someone else to enter my work space, nobody knows any of the hazards, not me and especially not the kids. Great post! I believe safety should be an all-year-round event, not just a moment of the year.
 
21 - 35 of 35 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top