LumberJocks

Reply by crank49

  • Advertise with us

Posted on A

View crank49's profile

crank49

4032 posts in 3480 days


#1 posted 10-26-2014 04:21 PM

The reason the NASA fuel cell tech was not promoted was cost. Those things were mentioned many, many times over the years but never were cost effective until fuel cost and environmental issues of today come into the picture.
NASA also developed other technologies for powering space craft that would make no sense to promote due to cost/benefit comparisons.
Nobody had to “steal” anything. 50 year old technology is free for the taking to anyone who wants to invest in development to bring it to market.


DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

HomeRefurbers.com