LumberJocks

Reply by Derek Cohen

  • Advertise with us

Posted on Iron Lie Nielsen No 3

View Derek Cohen's profile

Derek Cohen

455 posts in 4389 days


#1 posted 07-16-2017 04:38 AM

This issue of weight in a smoother is interesting.

I have both the bronze LN #3 and an iron vintage Stanley #3. There is a difference in weight, but I hardly register this. If anything, I prefer the slightly extra mass of the LN. Both are set up to use the chipbreaker to control tearout, and both produce the same performance on interlocked wood.

I have other smoothers with even greater variation. An HNT Gordon woodie weighs next-to-nothing. A Marcou weighs 8lbs !!

You would not want to use a smoother all day long if it is a heavy plane. But who uses a smoother this way? Smoothers are for finishing. All this involves is just a few strokes. Fatigue (due to pushing a heavy plane) is really irrelevant.

Now if we were discussing roughing planes, such as a jack, then I would argue for a woodie and lower weight every time. :)

Regards from Perth

Derek

-- Buildiing furniture, and reviewing and building tools at http://www.inthewoodshop.com


DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics

HomeRefurbers.com