Fixing Up a Stanley #6 #1: Doing things the old fashioned way...#1

  • Advertise with us
Blog entry by LucasinBC posted 03-04-2010 07:02 PM 1443 reads 1 time favorited 1 comment Add to Favorites Watch
no previous part Part 1 of Fixing Up a Stanley #6 series Part 2: Doing things the old fashioned way...#2 »

I should preface everything I am about to write by saying I am very new to woodworking and so I cannot be looked upon as anything but a beginner; I am no expert so don’t think this is a blog from a pro!

A few months ago I embarked on a journey to build a workbench based on a design inspired by Christopher Schwarz’s book “Workbenches.” Specifially I am attempting to build his French-style Roubo bench. Long-story short, I found it difficult to joint and plane the very long boards needed to make the top. I am using Douglas Fir and unfortunately it is a very “bendy” wood which requires a good amount of jointing in order to have flat surfaces for the big glue-up. I have a good power jointer, but to get the little high spots I got inspired by comments posted by Dave Pearce to use hand planes to flatten everything up.

So I bought a number 4 and number 6 off ebay. The number 6 looks pretty old – the cap shows a 1918 production date although I can’t be sure that the rest of the plane is from the same era…but I would not doubt it! I wound up paying about $40 for it. The number 4 was not a Stanley…it’s apparently at “Firestone” although I thought that was an auto-parts company…the production date on that one says 1946. Either way, it looks and behaves alot like a Stanley and I read somewhere on a blog that it is suspected that Stanley actually built those planes for companies like Firestone who just put their logo on it. In any case I only paid $10 for it so it was a good deal!

Here’s the Stanley Number 6 in “as-is” condition when it arrived:

Stanley Number 6 as is

Here is the front view:
Front View

And here is the sole:
Sole as is

It actually looks worse than it is. There was a lot of surface rust and darkened metal due to years of what I imagine is non-use. However, there are no cracks in the sole or anywhere else on the body of the plane. The frog is intact, no cracks, and the front and back handles were intact without any cracks. The top of the back handle is missing wood, which I believe was something done on occasion with older planes so that the adjustment screw could be tightened harder when the wood moved…but either way the handle is solid and there is no wiggle. All the parts were there so I just needed to clean it up…here we go!

-- Making mistakes is essential in learning woodworking.

1 comment so far

View WayneC's profile


14359 posts in 5380 days

#1 posted 03-04-2010 07:46 PM

It looks like it should clean up nicely.

-- We must guard our enthusiasm as we would our life - James Krenov

Have your say...

You must be signed in to post the comments.

DISCLAIMER: Any posts on LJ are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of LJ. LJ will not be held liable for the actions of any user.

Latest Projects | Latest Blog Entries | Latest Forum Topics